@Jae You realize that men get breast cancer too I hope.....
Yes. It is more rare.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Jae You realize that men get breast cancer too I hope.....
I've heard of it. Pushed by quite a few pseudoscience practitioners. Which isn't to say there's no science behind using thermography for mammograms, but in general the accuracy of it lags behind mammograms. I could see it being beneficial as a supplement to mammograms or in a situation where a mammogram isn't feasible for whatever reason.Interestingly enough, my sister informed me yesterday that she was having "thermography" to detect for breast cancer. She said her doctor recommended it for her because she has "dense breasts" . It's painless and doesn't use radiation.
Quite frankly I hadn't heard of it so I looked it up, seems it isn't the best way to diagnose breast cancer and is not recommended by the Canadian Cancer Society.
Canadian Cancer Society's perspective on thermography - Canadian
Thermography has a high false negative rate which means not detecting cancer when it actually is present:
Mammography vs. thermography: Comparing the benefits
Any chance of calling back to the clinic to speak to the radiologist for explanation?Dr's office called this morning. Message is that all is ok and to have another mammogram in 6 months. I'm mostly but not entirely relieved. I wonder what they saw and why they want to see if it changes in 6 month? I was on every other year or so.
Yes. It is more rare.
Will they do that? Any diagnostic stuff I had zero info given during in terms of what could be seen. All answers always given by my doctor, not a radiologist.Any chance of calling back to the clinic to speak to the radiologist for explanation?
BetteTheRed - PLEASE hustle your butt into the correct place for your overdue mammogram!